First Friday Book Synopsis

"…like CliffNotes on steroids…"

Q #214: What are some of the most interesting facts about Sun Tzu and The Art of War?

The Art of War

The Art of War

I am greatly indebted to Thomas Huynh who founded Sonshi.com in 1999 for the information he has accumulated. He was named among BusinessWeek magazine’s “Top 12 Most Engaged Reader-Contributors of 2008″ and is a co-author of The Art of War—Spirituality for Conflict with the editors of Sonshi.com. Here are his responses to four frequently asked questions about Sun Tzu and the book that many scholars believe he wrote.

Q: Why pick a Japanese word for Sun Tzu, a Chinese word?

Huynh: Like many Sun Tzu enthusiasts, we are intrigued by early Japanese culture. Our fascination was further fueled when we learned Sun Tzu was first introduced to Japan as early as 400 A.D. What we found was nothing less than Japan’s earnest efforts in applying Sun Tzu to warfare; the samurai would peruse its contents before each battle. From Takeda Shingen to Minamoto Yoshitsune, they were among the most diligent practitioners of the book’s concepts. Thus, it was appropriate to use the Japanese word for Sun Tzu: Sonshi. A user of Sonshi.com — of any nationality — would likewise want to learn Sun Tzu with the same degree of intensity.

Q: Was the original title just Sun Tzu and The Art of War subtitle was added much later?

Huynh: Yes, that is correct. It was customary at the time of Sun Tzu’s writing to title a work the same as its author. The subtitle was probably added later to provide a summary description of the work. This is why you will find us use “Sun Tzu” and “The Art of War” interchangeably. It is both the name of the author and the name of his only book (known to us). In ancient China, people did not write on paper as we do now; they used bamboo, wood, or silk. Thus, a “book” was oftentimes a roll of bamboo strips.

Q: Did Sun Tzu (Sun Wu) actually write The Art of War?

Huynh: This is a debatable issue. Some scholars believe it indeed was written by Sun Wu himself. However, others believe it was written by followers within the Sun Wu circle. Based on all the evidence we believe the work originally was written by Sun Wu, but later transcribers inserted words like “Sun-tzu said:” and “Ping Fa” (Art of War). After all, the text was highly regarded from day one from someone they obviously respected. The tactics presented could only have been written by somebody with deep knowledge in military strategy and not merely by followers. In addition, the writing also flows as if only one person wrote it.

Q: Many people have been led to believe that Sun Tzu beheaded a king’s favorite concubine to get the attention of the rest. Where is this incident in your account of Sun Tzu.

Huynh:
We don’t have this story in our translation because it’s not in the The Art of War. The story is actually in Ssu-ma Chien’s “Shih Chi,” mentioning Sun Tzu and this particular disciplinary action. “The Spring and Autumn Annals of Wu and Yueh” also tells this story except it states Sun Tzu was a native of Wu (not Chi). Sun Tzu training 180 court women to march like soldiers is quite an interesting incident, and thus is often inserted in many Sun Tzu books. Be advised some scholars view the story as apocryphal.

* * *

In Q&A #213, I provide an introduction to Thomas Cleary and a link to a rare and highly enlightening interview of him. You are urged to check out the resources provided at Sonshi.com. Here is a link to it:

http://sonshi.com/index.html

Comments, questions, requests, or suggestions? Please share them.

Friday, July 31, 2009 Posted by | Bob's blog entries | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Book Review: Reality Check

Reality CheckReality Check: The Irreverent Guide to Outsmarting, Outmanaging, and Outmarketing Your Competition
Guy Kawasaki
Portfolio/The Penguin Group (2008)

Having read all and then reviewed most of Guy Kawasaki’s eight previously published books, I was especially eager to read this one because it was rumored to provide everything he wishes he had known (but most of which he didn’t) when he embarked on his career in business (counting diamonds a fine-jewelry manufacturer called Nova Stylings) while at work on an MBA degree at UCLA. (He had already earned an undergraduate degree at Stanford.) Kawasaki later went to work for an educational software company called EduWare Services. However, Peachtree Software acquired the company and wanted him to move to Atlanta. “I don’t think so. I can’t live in a city where people call sushi ‘bait.’ Luckily, my Stanford roommate, Mike Boich, got me a job at Apple. When I saw what a Macintosh could do, the clouds parted and the angels started singing. For four years I evangelized Macintosh to software and hardware developers and led the charge against world-wide domination by IBM.” By now, presumably, he was accumulating a wealth of real-world experience in leadership and management and well as knowledge about marketing, sales, finance, strategic planning, problem-solving, resource allocation, and customer relations.

Reality Check exceeded my expectations. The twelve (12) “realities” that Kawasaki rigorously examines, in separate chapters devoted to each, include Starting Chapters 1-5), Raising Money (Chapters 6-15), Planning and Executing (Chapters 16-24), Innovating (Chapters 25-31), Marketing (Chapters 32-37), Selling and Evangelizing (Chapters 38-43), Communicating (Chapters 44-52), Beguiling (Chapters 53-63), Competing (Chapters 64-67), Hiring and Firing (Chapters 68-78), Working (Chapters 79-89 followed by a “Timeout”), and Doing Good (Chapters 90-94 followed by a “Conclusion.” Yes, that is correct: This book has 94 chapters plus a “Timeout” and a “Conclusion” provided within (count ‘em) 461 pages plus (thankfully) a comprehensive Index.

As is also true of Kawasaki’s eight other books, the tone is informal, conversational, and at times confrontational; also, the pace is frenetic and the writing style has Snap! Crackle! and Pop! Most important to me, the content is more abundant and of a higher quality than in any other of his previously published books.

Readers will welcome the use of bold face to highlight key points. This device will facilitate, indeed expedite frequent review of those key points later. I especially appreciate the inclusion of several interviews throughout the lively narrative. They include those of Fred Greguras on key legal issues in raising funds (Pages 51-59), Chip and Dan Heath on why only a few innovations “stick” and most don’t (Pages 130-138), Kathleen Gasperini on marketing to young people (Pages 168-175), Garr Reynolds on mastering the “Presentation Zen” approach (Pages 209-214), Robert Cialdini on the art and science of effective persuasion (Pages 243-250, and Libby Sartain shares her perspectives on the recruiting process (Pages 314-317). Note the variety of subjects covered during Kawasaki’s interviews. They correctly suggest the scope and diversity of his interests.

What sets this business book apart from almost others I have read in recent years is the extent to which it provides (quoting Kawasaki in the Introduction) “hardcore information to hardcore people who want to kick ass.” The focus is almost entirely on how to create and then sustain an organization whose people “make the world a better place because of it.” Presumably Kawasaki agrees with Thomas Edison: “Vision without execution is hallucination.” If not you, who? If not now, when?

Friday, July 31, 2009 Posted by | Bob's blog entries | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Interview: William A. Cohen

Cohen is founder and president of The Institute of Leader Arts. He is also a retired major general from the U.S. Air Force Reserve. After graduating from West Point, Cohen flew 174 combat missions in A-26 aircraft in the Vietnam War. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal, the Legion of Merit, the Distinguished Flying Cross with three oak leaf clusters, and the Air Medal with eleven oak leaf clusters. He has written 53 books, including The Stuff of Heroes, The New Art of Leadership and The Art of the Strategist. His latest is A Class with Drucker, based on his graduate study under Peter Drucker’s supervision and his personal friendship with him. He also has an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago as well as M.A, and Ph.D. degrees from Claremont Graduate University.

Here is a brief excerpt from my interview of Cohen:

Morris: How would you characterize Drucker’s teaching style?

Cohen: Mostly he lectured in what is probably the traditional European style, except that he used no notes whatsoever. Occasionally he would ask questions, and he would also welcome them, but most of his answers were not a few short comments. He used stories to illustrate his points as in his lectures. However, you had to listen closely as his stories in response to a question because, at first, the stories seemed to have no relevance whatsoever. This would lead to another point that seemed to have no relevance either and this could go on and on. However, if you stayed with him, sometimes for as long as an hour, he would suddenly tie everything together. It was only then that you realized that he felt that you needed to hear everything in order to understand fully the point he was making. He gave no tests, but he had us write a number of short papers for a course. He graded every single one of these papers himself, never with any help from graduate assistants.

Morris: At that time, graduate students and their professors (including Drucker) took dinner breaks and gathered at a cash bar in the Faculty Club, then dined together before resuming classes. There must have been some especially lively conversations.

Cohen: This was always true. However, it wasn’t a cash bar. The drinks and the meals were free. Unfortunately this practice had to be abandoned, probably because of the potential liability of the university in case of an accident as tired executives, who had had one or two drinks, drove home after a difficult day both at the office and in the classroom. However, I never knew anyone to abuse this and these conversations were useful with all of our professors, not just Peter. However I think he enjoyed them more than most and several of “the lost lessons” in my book came from these conversations. Peter knew who he was and what he could do. He was always observing, analyzing, and drawing conclusions. He considered himself a constant student. A classmate once asked him how he could make so many accurate predictions about the business world. “I listen,” he responded. And then with a typical, humorous, but no doubt accurate Drucker comment, he added: “To myself.”

If you wish to read the complete interview, please contact me at interllect@mindspring.com.

Cohen

Friday, July 31, 2009 Posted by | Bob's blog entries | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 106 other followers